4.8 Article

Biomass-based Hierarchical Porous Carbon for Supercapacitors: Effect of Aqueous and Organic Electrolytes on the Electrochemical Performance

期刊

CHEMSUSCHEM
卷 12, 期 23, 页码 5099-5110

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cssc.201902218

关键词

aqueous electrolyte; hierarchical porous carbon; high value-added utilization of biomass; organic electrolyte; supercapacitor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51502108]
  2. Foundation of Jilin Provence Development and Reform Commission, China [2014N145]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Biomass-based hierarchical porous carbon (SCPC) exhibits excellent electrochemical performance in electric double layer capacitors, prepared by carbonization and activation of straw cellulose. To investigate the potential applications of SCPC in supercapacitors, the effect of aqueous and organic electrolytes on the electrochemical performance of SCPC was studied in detail. In H2SO4, the SCPC electrode exhibits higher specific capacitance (358 F g(-1)) and outstanding cycling stability with 95.6 % capacitance retention over 10 000 cycles. The SCPC electrode shows superior rate capability with 90.7 % capacitance retention in KOH, and higher energy density of 17.9 Wh kg(-1) in Na2SO4. The SCPC electrode exhibits ideal capacitance characteristics, superior rate capability with capacitance retention of 95.8 %, and high energy density of 36.0 Wh kg(-1) in tetraethylammonium tetrafluoroborate/propylene carbonate (Et4NBF4/PC). The significant difference of capacitive performance of SCPC electrode in various electrolytes is mainly attributed to the difference in the electrolyte ion size, ionic conductivity, matching between the electrolyte ions and pore structure, and matching between anions and cations adsorbed on the positive and negative electrodes. This work not only establishes the relationship between the structure of SCPC and its electrochemical performance in different electrolytes, but also provides a reference for the high value-added utilization of SCPC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据