4.5 Article

High-Resolution Infrared Synchrotron Investigation of (HCN)2 and a Semi-Experimental Determination of the Dissociation Energy D0

期刊

CHEMPHYSCHEM
卷 20, 期 23, 页码 3238-3244

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.201900811

关键词

Dissociation Energy; Hydrogen Bonding; Infrared Synchrotron Radiation; Non-Covalent Forces; Vibrational Zero-Point Energy

资金

  1. CALIPSOplus project - European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation programme

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The high-resolution infrared absorption spectrum of the donor bending fundamental band nu 61 of the homodimer (HCN)(2) has been collected by long-path static gas-phase Fourier transform spectroscopy at 207 K employing the highly brilliant 2.75 GeV electron storage ring source at Synchrotron SOLEIL. The rovibrational structure of the nu 61 transition has the typical appearance of a perpendicular type band associated with a sigma-pi transition for a linear polyatomic molecule. The total number of 100 assigned transitions are fitted employing a standard semi-rigid linear molecule Hamiltonian, providing the band origin nu(0) of 779.05182(50) cm(-1) together with spectroscopic parameters for the degenerate excited state. This band origin, blue-shifted by 67.15 cm(-1) relative to the HCN monomer, provides the final significant contribution to the change of intra-molecular vibrational zero-point energy upon HCN dimerization. The combination with the vibrational zero-point energy contribution determined recently for the class of large-amplitude inter-molecular fundamental transitions then enables a complete determination of the total change of vibrational zero-point energy of 3.35 +/- 0.30 kJ mol(-1). The new spectroscopic findings together with previously reported benchmark CCSDT(Q)/CBS electronic energies [Hoobler et al. ChemPhysChem. 19, 3257-3265 (2018)] provide the best semi-experimental estimate of 16.48 +/- 0.30 kJ mol(-1) for the dissociation energy D-0 of this prototypical homodimer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据