4.7 Article

Comprehensive evaluation of the removal mechanism of carbamazepine and ibuprofen by metal organic framework

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 235, 期 -, 页码 527-537

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.208

关键词

Mechanism; Pharmaceuticals; Adsorption; Metal-organic framework; Water treatment

资金

  1. Korea Ministry of Environment (The SEM projects
  2. South Korea) [2018002470005]
  3. National Science Foundation (USA) [OIA-1632824]
  4. Korea Environment Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through Plant Research Program - Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (South Korea) [1485016267]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pharmaceutical products (PhACs) in water sources are considered to be a severe environmental issue. To mitigate this issue, we used a metal-organic framework (MOF) as an adsorbent to remove selected PhACs (i.e., carbamazepine (CBM) and ibuprofen (IBP)). This work was carried out to characterize the MOF, then confirm its feasibility for removing the selected PhACs. In particular, based on practical considerations, we investigated the effects of various water quality conditions, such as solution temperature, pH, ionic strength/background ions, and humic acid. MOF exhibited better removal rates than commercial powder activated carbon (PAC), considering pseudo-second order kinetic model. We clarified the competitive PhACs adsorption mechanisms based on the results obtained under various water quality conditions and found that hydrophobic interactions were the most important factors for both adsorbates. To confirm the practicality of MOF adsorption, we carried out regeneration tests with four adsorption and desorption cycles using acetone as a cleaning solution. Furthermore, to support the results of our regeneration tests, we characterized the MOF samples before and after adsorbate exposure using Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Overall, MOF can be used in practical applications as efficient adsorbents to remove PhACs from water sources. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据