4.4 Article

Genetic screening of farmed Atlantic salmon escapees demonstrates that triploid fish display reduced migration to freshwater

期刊

BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
卷 18, 期 5, 页码 1287-1294

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10530-016-1066-9

关键词

Farming; Genetic; Environment; Monitoring; Trisomy; Aquaculture

资金

  1. Norwegian Department of Industry and Fisheries
  2. Norwegian Research Council
  3. Erasmus mobility grant
  4. Chinese Scholarship Council
  5. NFR mobility grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Each year, hundreds of thousands of farmed Atlantic salmon escape from fish farms into the wild. Some of these escapees enter freshwater, and manage to interbreed with native populations. To hinder further genetic introgression in native populations, the use of sterile triploid salmon within commercial aquaculture is being examined. However, if triploid escapees migrate into freshwater, they may still have ecological impacts on local populations. In the present study, we used microsatellite DNA genotyping to determine the ploidy of 3794 farmed escapees captured in 17 Norwegian rivers in the period 2007-2014. Although a previous study has reported an average of 2 % triploids in Norwegian fish farms during this exact period, here, we only observed 7 (0.18 %) triploids among the escapees captured in freshwater. In addition, we identified three trisomic escapees. For the triploids where the within-river capture location was determined, they were only observed in the lower reaches and not on the spawning grounds. It is concluded that propensity for triploid Atlantic salmon to migrate into freshwater following escape from a fish farm is significantly lower than for normal diploid salmon escapees. Therefore, commercial production of triploids should not only be seen as an effective way of stopping genetic introgression, it will also significantly reduce the numbers of escapees entering rivers, which in turn limits ecological interactions and potential disease transmission.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据