4.7 Article

Enhanced removal of As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solution using ionic liquid-modified magnetic graphene oxide

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 234, 期 -, 页码 196-203

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.057

关键词

Magnetic graphene oxide; Ionic liquids; As(III); As(V); Removal

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41272262]
  2. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2016A040403112]
  3. Major Projects (Natural Science) of Education Department of Guangdong Province, China [261555101]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, ionic liquid (IL) 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([BMIM][PF6])-modified magnetic graphene oxide (MGO-IL) was prepared for the first time, and was used to adsorb and remove arsenic (As(III) and As(V)) ions from aqueous solution. MGO-IL was characterized by scanning electron microscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, and magnetization curves. Effects of ionic liquid type, solution pH, initial arsenic concentration and contact time on the adsorption performance of MGO-IL for As(III) and As(V) were studied. The experimental results showed that the adsorption equilibrium was achieved within 30 min, with maximum adsorption capacities of 160.65 mg g(-1) for As(III) and 104.13 mg g(-1) for As(V), respectively, and MGO-IL could be rapidly isolated from solution by applying a magnetic field. MGO-IL was reused for 5 times, without marked decrease in its adsorption capacities. Moreover, common coexisting anions did not interfere with the absorption of As(III) and As(V). Compared with MGO, the sorption quantities of MGO-IL for As(III) and As(V) were greatly enhanced, and the equilibrium time was significantly reduced. Therefore, MGO-IL can potentially serve as an excellent adsorbent for the simultaneous separation and removal of As(III) and As(V) from water. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据