4.5 Review

Organotypic and Microphysiological Models of Liver, Gut, and Kidney for Studies of Drug Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics, and Toxicity

期刊

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN TOXICOLOGY
卷 33, 期 1, 页码 38-60

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.9b00245

关键词

-

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council [201601153, 2016-01154]
  2. Strategic Research Programme in Diabetes at Karolinska Institutet
  3. Lennart Philipson Foundation
  4. Harald and Greta Jeansson Foundation
  5. Swedish Research Council [2016-01154] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite extensive breakthroughs in chemistry, molecular biology, and genetics in the last decades, the success rates of drug development projects remain low. To improve predictions of clinical efficacy and safety of new compounds, a plethora of 3D culture methods of human cells have been developed in which the cultured cells retain physiologically and functionally relevant phenotypes for multiple weeks. Here, we critically review current paradigms for organotypic cultures of human liver, gut, and kidney such as perfused microchips, spheroids, and hollow fiber bioreactors and discuss their utility for understanding drug pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and toxicity. Furthermore, bioprinting and the microfluidic integration of different tissue models to mimic systemic drug effects are highlighted as promising technological trends. In the last part of the review, we discuss important considerations regarding the choice of culture substratum material to limit adverse effects such as drug absorption while facilitating the phenotypic maintenance of cultured cells. We conclude that recent advances in organotypic and microphysiological culture models of human tissues can improve drug development and contribute to an amelioration of clinical attrition rates. However, further validation, benchmarking, and consolidation efforts are needed to achieve more widespread dissemination and eventually regulatory acceptance of these novel tools.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据