4.4 Article

A Smartphone-assisted Paper-based Analytical Device for Fluorescence Assay of Hg2+

期刊

CHEMICAL RESEARCH IN CHINESE UNIVERSITIES
卷 35, 期 6, 页码 972-977

出版社

HIGHER EDUCATION PRESS
DOI: 10.1007/s40242-019-9234-y

关键词

Paper-based analytical device; Nitrogen-doped carbon dot; Integrated sensing platform; Mercury ion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21873039, 21573087, 21573092]
  2. Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [2019A1515010596]
  3. Three Levels of Talent Project of Zhuhai College, Jilin University, China [2018TL006]
  4. Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of Zhuhai College, Jilin University, China [2018CXKYTD005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rapid, efficiency and portable detection systems in low-resource settings with limited laboratory equipment and technical expertise are urgently needed. Herein, an integrated platform composed of a paper-based analytical device and a smartphone detection system for Hg2+ onsite testing was developed. Nitrogen-doped carbon dots(N-CDs) were synthesized by a simple hydrothermal method using citric acid as the carbon source and ethanediamine as the nitrogen source, which gave out bright blue fluorescence under the excitation at 350 nm UV light and the absolute fluorescence quantum yield was 17.1%. The fluorescence of the prepared N-CDs can be effectively quenched by Hg2+. In addition, an external attachment of smartphone for illumination and external light interference was designed to trace the fluorescence signals, and a software application of Android system with simple operation program was developed to perform snapshot and image processing. The smartphone-assisted detection system was combined with the N-CDs decorated paper chip to achieve the sensitive detection of Hg2+ in water samples. This integrated method for reliable sensing of Hg2+ shows a good linear detection range of 10-800 mu mol/L(R-2=0.9595) with detection limit of 1.07x10(-8) mol/L.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据