4.6 Article

Numerical modelling and multi-objective optimization of the novel hydrocyclone for ultra-fine particles classification

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE
卷 207, 期 -, 页码 1072-1084

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ces.2019.07.031

关键词

Novel hydrocyclone; Computational fluid dynamics; Support vector machine; Radial basis function neural network; Multi-objective optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51504098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel hydrocyclone with arc inlet and convex cone is proposed to obtain the higher particles classification sharpness than the conventional design. The classification of the micron scale manganese dioxide particle is taken as a study case, and various methods are used to perform the modelling and optimization of the novel geometrical structure. Two performance indexes have been taken into consideration in the multi-objective optimization which are the classification sharpness, S-s and total pressure drop, Delta P. The numerical experiments designed via response surface methodology are carried out using computation fluid dynamics simulations of Eulerian-Eulerian strategy. The obtained data sets are utilized for modelling the performance indexes by support vector machine (SVM) and radial basis function neural network (RBFNN) approaches. The optimal structure with the classification sharpness of 0.956 is searched using the genetic algorithm (GA) in contrast to the conventional design of 0.849. Flow field analysis illustrates that the extended radial space, strengthened centrifugal field and inlet pre-classification effect of the optimal design improve the classification sharpness. However, the narrower inlet cross area leads to a higher pressure drop. The Pareto front of the multi-objective optimization is obtained using the NSGA-II algorithm to provide alternatives for the optimal performance of the novel hydrocyclone. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据