4.7 Article

Synthesis of porous NiCoS nanosheets with Al leaching on ordered mesoporous carbon for high-performance supercapacitors

期刊

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 384, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.123367

关键词

NiCoS; Hydrothermal sulfuration; Etching; Al leaching; Supercapacitor

资金

  1. Graduate Research and innovation of Chongqing, China [CYB18002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21576034, 51771037]
  3. State Education Ministry and Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2019CDQYCL042, 2018CDYJSY0055, 106112017CDJXSYY0001, 106112017CDJQJ138802, 106112017CDJSK04XK11, 2018CDQYCL0027]
  4. Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China-Guangdong [U1801254]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ordered mesoporous carbon (SBA-C) with parallel channels, synthesized using mesoporous silicon (SBA-15) as a hard template, is decorated with nanoflowers assembled by porous nickel cobalt sulfide (NiCoS) nanosheets with Al leaching through an oil bath following by a hydrothermal method. The nickel cobalt aluminum layered double hydroxide (NiCoAl LDH) precursor is successfully in-situ transformed into NiCoS nanosheets with Al leaching due to the replace of OH and CO32- ions of the NiCoAl LDH precursor by S2- and the Kirkendall effects to etch and dissolve Al hydroxide. The NiCoS@SBA-C electrode shows surprising electrochemical performance, such as an excellent specific supercapacitance of 1757 F g(-1) at a current density of 1 A g(-1), superior rate capacity of 79.68% retention at 20 A g(-1), and good cycling stability. An asymmetric supercapacitor (ASC) is assembled employing NiCoS@SBA-C as positive electrode and SBA-C as negative electrode, which delivers a high energy density of 38.8 Wh kg(-1) at a power density of 800 W kg(-1). The above results revel that incorporating ordered mesoporous carbon with transition metal sulfides is a candidate electrode material for application of energy storage devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据