4.7 Article

The influences of correlated spatially random perturbations on first passage time in a linear-cubic potential

期刊

CHAOS
卷 29, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/1.5116626

关键词

-

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
  2. National Science Foundation of China [11772255]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  4. Shaanxi Project for Distinguished Young Scholars

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influences of correlated spatially random perturbations (SRPs) on the first passage problem are studied in a linear-cubic potential with a time-changing external force driven by a Gaussian white noise. First, the escape rate in the absence of SRPs is obtained by Kramers' theory. For the random potential case, we simplify the escape rate by multiplying the escape rate of smooth potentials with a specific coefficient, which is to evaluate the influences of randomness. Based on this assumption, the escape rates are derived in two scenarios, i.e., small/large correlation lengths. Consequently, the first passage time distributions (FPTDs) are generated for both smooth and random potential cases. We find that the position of the maximal FPTD has a very good agreement with that of numerical results, which verifies the validity of the proposed approximations. Besides, with increasing the correlation length, the FPTD shifts to the left gradually and tends to the smooth potential case. Second, we investigate the most probable passage time (MPPT) and mean first passage time (MFPT), which decrease with increasing the correlation length. We also find that the variation ranges of both MPPT and MFPT increase nonlinearly with increasing the intensity. Besides, we briefly give constraint conditions to guarantee the validity of our approximations. This work enables us to approximately evaluate the influences of the correlation length of SRPs in detail, which was always ignored previously. Published under license by AIP Publishing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据