4.6 Article

Posterior Alpha and Gamma Oscillations Index Divergent and Superadditive Effects of Cognitive Interference

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 30, 期 3, 页码 1931-1945

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhz214

关键词

double dissociation; magnetoencephalography; multisource interference task; neural oscillations; superadditivity

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01-MH103220, R01-MH116782, R01-MH118013, F31AG055332]
  2. National Science Foundation [1539067]
  3. NASA Nebraska Space Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conflicts at various stages of cognition can cause interference effects on behavior. Two well-studied forms of cognitive interference are stimulus-stimulus (e.g., Flanker), where the conflict arises from incongruence between the task-relevant stimulus and simultaneously presented irrelevant stimulus information, and stimulus-response (e.g., Simon), where interference is the result of an incompatibility between the spatial location of the task-relevant stimulus and a prepotent motor mapping of the expected response. Despite substantial interest in the neural and behavioral underpinnings of cognitive interference, it remains uncertain how differing sources of cognitive conflict might interact, and the spectrally specific neural dynamics that index this phenomenon are poorly understood. Herein, we used an adapted version of the multisource interference task and magnetoencephalography to investigate the spectral, temporal, and spatial dynamics of conflict processing in healthy adults (N = 23). We found a double-dissociation such that, in isolation, stimulus-stimulus interference was indexed by alpha (8-14 Hz), but not gamma-frequency (64-76 Hz) oscillations in the lateral occipital regions, while stimulus-response interference was indexed by gamma oscillations in nearby cortices, but not by alpha oscillations. Surprisingly, we also observed a superadditive effect of simultaneously presented interference types (multisource) on task performance and gamma oscillations in superior parietal cortex.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据