4.7 Article

Hydrophobic to hydrophilic surface transformation of nano-scale zinc ferrite via oleic acid coating: Magnetic hyperthermia study towards biomedical applications

期刊

CERAMICS INTERNATIONAL
卷 46, 期 6, 页码 7642-7653

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.11.265

关键词

Surface modified ZnFe2O4; Hydrophilic surface; Magnetic hyperthermia; BET-BJH analysis; Superparamagnetic; Cell viability

资金

  1. Department of Science and Technology, Government of India through 'INSPIRE Fellowship' [IF170288]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoscale spinel zinc ferrite (ZNF) was prepared by sol-gel auto-ignition route and subsequently its surface was modified by oleic-acid (OA) coating. The pristine and surface modified ZNF nanoparticles (UC-ZNF and OA-ZNF) were characterized by standard techniques. XRD patterns of both the samples ensured the nanocrystalline monophasic cubic-spinel lattice structure with 'Fd-3m space-group'. FT-IR spectra revealed the presence of vibrational frequency-modes of spinet structure and successful coating of OA over ZNF. The nano-size spherical grains with some agglomeration and OA coating over ZNF were visualized in FE-SEM images. The hydrophobic-to-hydrophilic surface-transition of ZNF was confirmed by water contact-angle measurements. The BET surface-area and distribution of pore-radius was evaluated by recording N-2-isotherms. The M - H plots confirmed the superparamagnetic nature of both the samples. Optical properties were studied by UV-Vis and PL spectroscopy techniques. The colloidal-stability and distribution of particle-sizes were estimated by zeta-potential and DLS measurements. Magnetic hyperthermia studies were carried out for different concentrations (2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 mg/mL) of both the samples. The biocompatible nature of both the samples was studied by cell-viability studies. All these results ensure the implementation of OA-ZNF nanoparticles with minimum dose rate (8 mg/mL) in magnetic hyperthermia therapies for cancer treatment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据