4.7 Review

The regulatory role of Myomaker and Myomixer-Myomerger-Minion in muscle development and regeneration

期刊

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
卷 77, 期 8, 页码 1551-1569

出版社

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-019-03341-9

关键词

Myoblast fusion; Myogenesis; Myomaker; Myomixer-Myomerger-Minion; Myotube; Skeletal muscle

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFA0800403]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31722053, 31672427]
  3. Young overseas high-level talents introduction plan funding
  4. Hundred Talents Program from Zhejiang University

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Skeletal muscle plays essential roles in motor function, energy, and glucose metabolism. Skeletal muscle formation occurs through a process called myogenesis, in which a crucial step is the fusion of mononucleated myoblasts to form multinucleated myofibers. The myoblast/myocyte fusion is triggered and coordinated in a muscle-specific way that is essential for muscle development and post-natal muscle regeneration. Many molecules and proteins have been found and demonstrated to have the capacity to regulate the fusion of myoblast/myocytes. Interestingly, two newly discovered muscle-specific membrane proteins, Myomaker and Myomixer (also called Myomerger and Minion), have been identified as fusogenic regulators in vertebrates. Both Myomaker and Myomixer-Myomerger-Minion have the capacity to directly control the myogenic fusion process. Here, we review and discuss the latest studies related to these two proteins, including the discovery, structure, expression pattern, functions, and regulation of Myomaker and Myomixer-Myomerger-Minion. We also emphasize and discuss the interaction between Myomaker and Myomixer-Myomerger-Minion, as well as their cooperative regulatory roles in cell-cell fusion. Moreover, we highlight the areas for exploration of Myomaker and Myomixer-Myomerger-Minion in future studies and consider their potential application to control cell fusion for cell-therapy purposes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据