4.7 Article

Life after logging in tropical forests of Borneo: A meta-analysis

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 182-188

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2016.02.020

关键词

Biodiversity; IUCN; Logging; Rainforests; Silviculture; Vertebrates

资金

  1. Research Foundation of Flanders [12A7714N]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council [J024597, M005941, N013832]
  3. Sir Henry Wellcome [WT107400MA]
  4. Sheffield Vice-Chancellor's Fellowships
  5. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M005941/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. NERC [NE/M005941/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Selectively logged tropical forests retain high species richness and functional diversity, but species composition changes after logging, suggesting that some species are more vulnerable to logging than others. We did a meta-analysis to summarise the effect of logging on the abundance of individual bird and mammal species in tropical forests of Borneo, which have suffered some of the most intense selective logging in the tropics. We found that species classified by the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) as 'vulnerable' or 'near-threatened' are generally less abundant in logged tropical forests than those classified as 'least concern'. However, the effect of logging within each IUCN category is variable, indicating that logging is not the only or main cause of decline in abundance. While our results show that closely related species responded similarly to. logging, in birds there was significant variation between responses of some closely related species. Bigger species were significantly more susceptible to logging than smaller species in both birds and mammals. We also found that cavity-nesting birds suffered more from logging than did other species. Our results highlight the importance of identifying which factors lead individual species to flourish or suffer in logged tropical forests. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据