4.7 Editorial Material

Why did remote ischaemic conditioning not improve clinical outcomes in acute myocardial infarction in the CONDI-2/ERIC-PPCI trial?

期刊

CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH
卷 115, 期 14, 页码 E161-E163

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/cvr/cvz242

关键词

-

资金

  1. British Heart Foundation [CS/14/3/31002, FS/10/039/28270]
  2. University College London Hospital/University College London Biomedical Research Clinical Research grant
  3. Danish Innovation Foundation [11-108354, 11-115818]
  4. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF13OC0007447, NNF14OC0013337, NNF15OC0016674]
  5. Trygfonden [109624]
  6. National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
  7. Duke-National University Singapore Medical School, Singapore Ministry of Health's National Medical Research Council under its Clinician Scientist-Senior Investigator scheme [NMRC/CSA-SI/0011/2017]
  8. Collaborative Centre Grant scheme [NMRC/CGAug16C006]
  9. Singapore Ministry of Education Academic Research Fund Tier 2 [MOE2016-T2-2-021]
  10. COST Action EU-CARDIOPROTECTION [CA16225]
  11. COST [European Cooperation in Science and Technology]
  12. MRC [MC_G1002673] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据