4.8 Article

Adhesion of T Cells to Endothelial Cells Facilitates Blinatumomab-Associated Neurologic Adverse Events

期刊

CANCER RESEARCH
卷 80, 期 1, 页码 91-101

出版社

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-1131

关键词

-

类别

资金

  1. Amgen Inc.
  2. Amgen Research (Munich) GmbH

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Blinatumomab, a CD19/CD3-bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, is associated with neurologic adverse events in a subgroup of patients. Here, we provide evidence for a two-step process for the development of neurologic adverse events in response to blinatumomab: (i) blinatumomab induced B-cell-independent redistribution of peripheral T cells, including T-cell adhesion to blood vessel endothelium, endothelial activation, and T-cell transmigration into the perivascular space, where (ii) blinatumomab induced B-cell-dependent T-cell activation and cytokine release to potentially trigger neurologic adverse events. Evidence for this process includes (i) the coincidence of T-cell redistribution and the early occurrence of most neurologic adverse events, (ii) T-cell transmigration through brain microvascular endothelium, (iii) detection of T cells, B cells, and blinatumomab in cerebrospinal fluid, (iv) blinatumomab-induced T-cell rolling and adhesion to vascular endothelial cells in vitro, and (v) the ability of antiadhesive agents to interfere with blinatumomab-induced interactions between T cells and vascular endothelial cells in vitro and in patients. On the basis of these observations, we propose a model that could be the basis of mitigation strategies for neurologic adverse events associated with blinatumomab treatment and other T-cell therapies. Significance This study proposes T-cell adhesion to endothelial cells as a necessary but insufficient first step for development of blinatumomab-associated neurologic adverse events and suggests interfering with adhesion as a mitigation approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据