4.3 Article

The Optimal Duration of PTH(1-34) Infusion Is One Hour per Day to Increase Bone Mass in Rats

期刊

BIOLOGICAL & PHARMACEUTICAL BULLETIN
卷 39, 期 4, 页码 625-630

出版社

PHARMACEUTICAL SOC JAPAN
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.b15-00756

关键词

parathyroid hormone; bone mineral density; infusion; bone formation; bone marker; rat

资金

  1. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is a potential medicine for osteoporosis, and subcutaneous (s.c.) PTH treatment enhances bone mass; however, continuous infusion of PTH elicits bone resorption and induces bone loss. To clarify this contradictory phenomenon, we examined bone markers and bone mass in rats to assess the optimal duration of PTH(1-34) infusion. Continuous infusion of PTH at 1 mu g/kg/h (C-ss, steady-state concentration ca. 300 pg/mL) for 1-4h clearly stimulated the expression both of bone formation-related genes (c-fos, Wnt4, EphrinB2) and of bone resorption-related genes (tnfsf11, tnfsf11b, encoding receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL), osteoprotegerin (OPG)), but s.c. treatment stimulated these genes only 1-h after the injection. Rats were treated with 1-, 2-, or 4-h infusions of PTH daily using a totally implanted catheter system, and the femoral bone mineral density (BMD) was measured at 4 weeks. The 1-h infusion of PTH significantly stimulated serum bone formation markers (procollagen I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and osteocalcin) on day 14 and femoral BMD at 2 and 4 weeks, but the 4-h infusion of PTH did not enhance BMD. Since the 4-h infusion increased the levels of both the bone formation markers and a bone resorption marker (urinary C-terminal telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTx)), the increased bone resorption may predominate over bone formation. The intermittent elevation of plasma PTH to 300 pg/mL for 1-h each day is optimal for increasing bone mass in rats. In osteoporosis therapy in human, using the optimal duration for the clinical dose of PTH may selectively stimulate bone formation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据