4.4 Article

Detection of frailty in older patients using a mobile app: cross-sectional observational study in primary care

期刊

BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
卷 70, 期 690, 页码 E29-E35

出版社

ROYAL COLL GENERAL PRACTITIONERS
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp19X706577

关键词

frail elderly; frailty; general practice; mobile aplications; statistical models

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background The main instruments used to assess frailty am the Fried frailty phenotype and the Fatigue, Resistance, Ambulation, Illnesses, and Loss of Weight (FRAIL) scale. Both instruments contain items that must be obtained in a personal interview and cannot be used with an electronic medical record only. Aim To develop and internally validate a prediction model, based on a points system and integrated in an application (app) for Android, to predict frailty using only variables taken from a patient's clinical history. Design and setting A cross-sectional observational study undertaken across the Valencian Community. Spain. Method A sample of 621 older patients was analysed from January 2017 to May 2018. The main variable was frailty measured using the TRAIL scale. Candidate predictors were: sex. age, comorbidities, or clinical situations that could affect daily life, polypharmacy, and hospital admission in the last year. A total of 3472 logistic regression models were estimated. The model with the largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was selected and adapted to the points system. This system was validated by bootstrapping, determining discrimination (AUC), and calibration (smooth calibration). Results A total of 126(20.3%) older people were identified as being frail. The points system had an AUC of 0.78 and included as predictors: sex. age, polypharmacy, hospital admission in the last year , and diabetes. Calibration was satisfactory. Conclusion A points system was developed to predict frailty in older people using parameters that are easy to obtain and recorded in the clinical history. Future research should be carried out to externally validate the constructed model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据