4.5 Article

QRFP administration into the medial hypothalamic nuclei improves memory in rats

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1727, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146563

关键词

QRFP; Antagonist BIBP3226; Medial hypothalamus; Spatial memory; Morris water maze; Elevated plus maze

资金

  1. New National Excellence Program of the Ministry of Human Capacities [UNKP-18-3-III (PTE-374)]
  2. 2/2015 PhD + 1 Dean's Grant of the Pecs University Medical School
  3. Hungarian Academy of Sciences
  4. [SROP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0029]
  5. [SROP-4.2.1/B-10/2/KONV-2010-0002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Even though several of RFamide peptides have been shown to modify memory and learning processes in different species, almost nothing is known regarding cognitive effects of recently discovered neuropeptide QRFP. Considering multiple physiological functions of QRFP, localization of QRFP-synthesizing neurons in the hypothalamus and its' widely spread binding sites within the CNS, the present study was designed to investigate the possible role of QRFP in the consolidation of spatial memory. As target area for microinjection, the medial hypothalamic area, including dorsomedial (DMN) and ventromedial (VMN) nuclei, has been chosen. At first, the effects of two doses (200 ng and 400 ng) of QRFP were investigated in Morris water maze. After that receptor antagonist BIBP3226 (equimolar amount to the effective dose of neuropeptide) was applied to elucidate whether it can prevent effects of QRFP. To reveal possible changes in anxiety level, animals were tested in Elevated plus maze. The higher dose of QRFP (400 ng) improved short-term memory consolidation in Morris water maze. Pretreatment with antagonist BIBP3226 abolished cognitive effects of QRFP. The neuropeptide did not affect anxiety level of rats. This study provides unique evidence regarding the role of QRFP in the consolidation of memory and gives the basis for further investigations of neuropeptide's cognitive effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据