4.5 Article

Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion alters amyloid-β transport related proteins in the cortical blood vessels of Alzheimer's disease model mouse

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1723, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146379

关键词

Alzheimer's disease; Amyloid-beta transport; Chronic cerebral hypoperfusion; Edaravone

资金

  1. Hirose International Scholarship Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abnormal accumulation of amyloid-beta (A beta) peptide defines progression of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology in brain. Here, we investigated expressive changes of two main All transport receptors low-density lipoprotein receptor related protein-1 (LRP1) and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE) in a novel AD mice (APP23) with chronic cerebral hypoperfusion (CCH) model, moreover, examined a protective effect of a free radical scavenger edaravone (Eda). In contrast to wild type (WT) and APP23 mice, CCH strongly accelerated abnormal A beta 40 depositions and cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) pathology, increased both LRP1 and RAGE expressions in brain parenchyma, while a decrease of LRP1 and an increase of RAGE were observed in vascular endothelial cells at age 12 months (M) of AD mice. Furthermore, CCH strongly increased expressions of two hypoxia-related proteins hypoxia inducible factor-1 alpha (HIF-1 alpha) and heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), two oxidative-related proteins 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE) and 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and decreased both two vital nutrient transporter proteins major facilitator super family domain containing 2a (Mfsd2a) and glucose transporter 1 (Glut1) expressions. Such the above abnormal pathological changes were significantly ameliorated by edaravone treatment. The present study demonstrated that CCH strongly enhanced primary AD pathology causing double imbalances of A beta efflux and influx transport related proteins in the cortical blood vessels in AD mice, and that such a neuropathologic abnormality was greatly ameliorated by Eda.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据