4.7 Article

Do upsetting life events explain the relationship between low socioeconomic status and systemic inflammation in childhood? Results from a longitudinal study

期刊

BRAIN BEHAVIOR AND IMMUNITY
卷 84, 期 -, 页码 90-96

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.11.013

关键词

ALSPAC; SES; Inflammation; Life events; Childhood; IL-6

资金

  1. Wellcome [102215/2/13/2]
  2. UK Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) [ES/P001742/1]
  3. ESRC PhD studentship award
  4. UK Medical Research Council [102215/2/13/2]
  5. ESRC [1992039, ES/P001742/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. MRC [MC_PC_19009] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Children from families of low socioeconomic status (SES) are more likely to be exposed to upsetting situations and stressors. Such exposures have, in turn, been linked to inflammation in some studies. In this study we explore if low SES is related to inflammation in children via such stressful life events. Methods: Data on 4525 children of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children, a general population birth cohort, were used to explore associations between SES at ages 0-3 years, upsetting life events at ages 3-9 years and inflammatory markers [interleukin 6 (IL-6) and C-reactive protein (CRP)] at age 9 years. Confounders included body mass index, gender, financial problems, and upsetting life events at ages 0-3 years. Results: Using Structural Equation Modelling, we found that early socioeconomic disadvantage predicted higher levels of IL-6 (beta = 0.034, 95% CI = 0.005, 0.063) even after adjusting for confounders. This association was partially mediated by upsetting life events (beta = 0.003, 95% CI = 0.001, 0.006). Conclusions: In the general child population, low SES is associated with increased exposure to stressful life events, in turn associated with later inflammation. These findings highlight the role of stressors associated with poverty and disadvantage in the development of inflammation among children in the general population.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据