4.3 Article

Bioprocess optimization of laccase production through solid substrate fermentation using Perenniporia tephropora-L168 and its application in bioremediation of triaryl-methane dye

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY PROGRESS
卷 36, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/btpr.2916

关键词

bioremediation; dye degradation; laccase; solid substrate fermentation

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India New Delhi [BT/PR6428/PID/6/706/2012]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Laccases are multi copper oxidases that can oxidize both phenolic and nonphenolic lignin related compounds. Consequently, there has been continuous demand for laccases for the oxidative degradation of phenolic dyes in effluents. In view of this, the present work was focused on laccase production by solid substrate fermentation using a newly isolated fungus Perenniporia tephropora-L168. To intensify the laccase production, the process parameters pH, nitrogen, inducer, and substrate: water ratio were optimized by using statistical model. A set of optimal conditions noted were pH 3, nitrogen 0.001g/L; inducer 0.5% and substrate: water ratio (1:10), which yielded laccase 1,160U/g. The crude laccase exhibited noteworthy potential to degrade a triaryl-methane dye especially Malachite green. Also, during bioremediation studies, the statistical process optimization could achieve 81% decolourization within 180min. The laccase treatment brought chemical transformation in malachite green as evident from UV-Visible spectra, FTIR, HPLC while toxicity against bacteria and fungi was also reduced. During phytotoxicity study, effect of treated and untreated dye on germination of seed was analyzed. Interestingly, the germination index for Vigna aconitifolia and Vigna radiata was increased by two and fourfold, respectively. Overall, this work demonstrates optimized production of laccase using Perenniporia tephropora-L168 and its efficient bioremediation potential for triaryl-methane dye.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据