4.3 Article

Efficient production of gamma-aminobutyric acid by engineeredSaccharomyces cerevisiaewith glutamate decarboxylases fromStreptomyces

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY AND APPLIED BIOCHEMISTRY
卷 67, 期 2, 页码 240-248

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bab.1840

关键词

gamma-aminobutyric acid; glutamate decarboxylase; heterologous expression; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; whole-cell bioconversion

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31741102, 31871763] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LY14C200007] Funding Source: Medline
  3. Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province [2017C02033, 2018C02053] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Hangzhou Science and Technology Bureau [171593] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) is an industrially valuable natural product. This study was aimed to establish an efficient food-grade production process of GABA by engineeringSaccharomyces cerevisiaethat is generally recognized as safe (GRAS). GABA can be produced by catalytic decarboxylation ofl-glutamate (l-Glu) by glutamate decarboxylase (GAD, EC4.1.1.15). Two GADs, SsGAD fromStreptomyces sp. MJ654-NF4 and ScGAD fromStreptomyces chromofuscusATCC 49982, were heterologously expressed inS. cerevisiaeBJ5464. The engineered yeast strains were used as whole-cell biocatalysts for GABA production.S. cerevisiaeBJ5464/SsGAD exhibited significantly higher efficient catalytic activity than that ofS. cerevisiaeBJ5464/ScGAD. The optimal bioconversion system consisted of a cell density of OD(600)30, 0.1 Ml-Glu, and 0.28 mM pyridoxal phosphate in 0.2 M Na2HPO4-citric acid buffer with pH 5.4, and the reactions were performed at 50 degrees C for 12 H.S. cerevisiaeBJ5464/SsGAD cells can be reused, and the accumulated GABA titer reached 62.6 g/L after 10 batches with an overall molar conversion rate of 60.8 mol%. This work thus provides an effective production process of GABA using engineered yeast for food and pharmaceutical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据