4.8 Article

An affinity peptide-incorporated electrochemical biosensor for the detection of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin

期刊

BIOSENSORS & BIOELECTRONICS
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111482

关键词

Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin; Peptide receptor; Sensitivity; Electrochemical sensor

资金

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Korea government (MSIP) [NRF2017R1A2A2A05001037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we demonstrate a novel affinity peptide-incorporated electrochemical biosensor for the detection of acute kidney injury and the diabetic biomarker neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL). Biopanning of the M13 phage display library over immobilized NGAL led to the rapid identification of unique affinity peptide with an amino acid sequence of DRWVARDPASIF, and the peptide-displayed phage particles were found to be specific affinities for NGAL. To address the development of peptide-based electrochemical sensor, a series of synthetic peptides away from phage particles was rationally designed, chemically synthesized, and immobilized to a gold sensor layer. Among five synthetic peptide derivatives tested, NGAL BP1 was selected as most promising recognition receptor, and its binding affinity was monitored by SWV and EIS. Using EIS, the limit of detection (LOD) was 1.74 ng/mL, while SWV had a LOD of 3.93 ng/mL. The detection performance of the peptide-incorporated sensor was comparable to commercially available ELISA NGAL detection kits. In addition, the validation of the peptide sensor was also confirmed with plasma from patients, and it was observed that the sensitivity of the peptide sensor showed a statistically significant difference. Our results show that the phage and peptide sensor system could detect NGAL with high sensitivity and selectivity, and this suggests its potential use as a biosensing platform for monitoring NGAL in a miniaturized electrochemical biosensor.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据