4.6 Article

The inhibition of tumor protein p53 by microRNA-151a-3p induced cell proliferation, migration and invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

期刊

BIOSCIENCE REPORTS
卷 39, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BSR20191357

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A close relation between microRNA-151a-3p (miR-151a-3p) and nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) has been reported, however, the molecular mechanism is still unclear. The aim of the present study was to explore the mechanism in the promotion of miR-151a-3p to NPC progression. The levels ofmiR-151-3p in several NPC cell lines were detected in order to screen an experimental cell line. MiR-151a-3p mimic and inhibitor were constructed and transfected into 5-8F cells and cell proliferation were detected by Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8). The apoptosis rate, cell migration and invasion were determined by flow cytometry, wound healing and Transwell assays. The predicted target was further verified by luciferase reporter assay. Real-time quantification-PCR and Western blot were carried out for mRNA and protein level analysis. Tumor protein p53 was co-transfected to verify the functions of miR-151a-3p. The miR-151a-3p level in NPC tissues was much higher than that in adjacent tissues. After transfecting cells with miR-151a-3p mimic, the cell proliferation and patients' survival rate were much increased, and this was accompanied by the increase in B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) and decreases in Bax and cleaved caspase-3 (P<0.01). Moreover, the migration rate and number of invaded cells were also remarkably increased, however, the miR-151a-3p inhibitor had opposite effects on the 5-8F cells. Noticeably, p53 was revealed as a potential target of miR-151a-3p. Co-transfection of P53 could partially reverse the promotive effects of miR-151a-3p on NPC cell progression. Our data indicated that blocking p53 expression and mediated signal pathways contribute to the positive effects of miR-151a-3p on NPC cell proliferation, migration and invasion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据