4.8 Article

Elucidating the effect of mixing technologies on dynamics of microbial communities and their correlations with granular sludge properties in a high-rate sulfidogenic anaerobic bioreactor for saline wastewater treatment

期刊

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
卷 297, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122397

关键词

Saline wastewater treatment; Biological sulfate reduction; Sulfidogenic bioreactor; Mixing modes; Sulfur bacteria

资金

  1. Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China [T21-604/19-R]
  2. Hong Kong Innovation and Technology Commission [ITCCNERC14EG03]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51638005]
  4. Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee Project [JSGG2017101071620730]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, three lab-scale anaerobic sulfidogenic bioreactors were operated independently using three different mixing modes (hydraulic, mechanical and pneumatic). One-way ANOVA test indicated various performance parameters (e.g. sulfate reduction and sulfide production) and granular sludge properties (e.g. EPS and particle size) statistically different in three mixing modes. Principal component analysis (PCA) and OTUs-based network demonstrated bacterial composition greatly varied among the three mixing modes. The phylum Proteobacteria was predominant among the bacterial communities, and the genus Desulfobacter (35.1% in hydraulic, 31.1% in mechanical and 27.4% in pneumatic sample) was the most dominant SRB. The PCA/Pearson's correlation analysis confirmed SRB had significant positive relationship with sludge properties (e.g. particle size). PICRUSt data highlighted that bacterial communities contained diverse predicted functions including sulfur metabolism enzymes (sulfite reductase and adenylylsulfate reductase). The findings of this research could be helpful for selection of an appropriate mixing technology for anaerobic sulfidogenic or similar bioprocess.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据