4.8 Article

Bi-specific tenascin-C and fibronectin targeted peptide for solid tumor delivery

期刊

BIOMATERIALS
卷 219, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2019.119373

关键词

Affinity targeting; Homing peptide; Extracellular matrix; GEM; Prostate carcinoma; Magnetic resonance imaging; Nanomedicine; T7 phage display

资金

  1. European Union through the European Regional Development Fund [2014-2020.4.01.15-0012]
  2. EMBO Installation Grant [2344]
  3. European Research Council grant GLIOMA DDS from European Regional Development Fund
  4. European Research Council grant GlioGuide from European Regional Development Fund
  5. Wellcome Trust International Fellowship [WT095077MA]
  6. Cancer Center Support grant from the US National Cancer Institute [CA30199]
  7. Norwegian Cancer Society
  8. Norwegian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Oncofetal fibronectin (FN-EDB) and tenascin-C C domain (TNC-C) are nearly absent in extracellular matrix of normal adult tissues but upregulated in malignant tissues. Both FN-EDB and TNC-C are developed as targets of antibody-based therapies. Here we used peptide phage biopanning to identify a novel targeting peptide (PL1, sequence: PPRRGLIKLKTS) that interacts with both FN-EDB and TNC-C. Systemic PL1-functionalized model nanoscale payloads [iron oxide nanoworms (NWs) and metallic silver nanoparticles] homed to glioblastoma (GBM) and prostate carcinoma xenografts, and to non-malignant angiogenic neovessels induced by VEGF-overexpression. Antibody blockage experiments demonstrated that PL1 tumor homing involved interactions with both receptor proteins. Treatment of GBM mice with PL1-targeted model therapeutic nanocarrier (NWs loaded with a proapoptotic peptide) resulted in reduced tumor growth and increased survival, whereas treatment with untargeted particles had no effect. PL1 peptide may have applications as an affinity ligand for delivery of diagnostic and therapeutic compounds to microenvironment of solid tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据