4.7 Article

Online sentiment towards iconic species

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 241, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108289

关键词

Digital conservation; Culturomics; Illegal wildlife trade; Natural language processing; Social media; Sentiment analysis

资金

  1. University of Helsinki
  2. Academy of Finland [295624]
  3. Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS)
  4. European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program [802933]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Studies assessing online public sentiment towards biodiversity conservation are almost non-existent. The use of social media data and other online data sources is increasing in conservation science. We collected social media and online news data pertaining to rhinoceros, which are iconic species especially threatened by illegal wildlife trade, and assessed online sentiment towards these species using natural language processing methods. We also used an outlier detection technique to identify the most prominent conservation-related events imprinted into this data. We found that tragic events, such as the death of the last male northern white rhinoceros, Sudan, in March 2018, triggered the strongest reactions, which appeared to be concentrated in western countries, outside rhinoceros range states. We also found a strong temporal cross-correlation between social media data volume and online news volume in relation to tragic events, while other events only appeared in either social media or online news. Our results highlight that the public is concerned about biodiversity loss and this, in turn, can be used to increase pressure on decision makers to develop adequate conservation actions that can help reverse the biodiversity crisis. The proposed methods and analyses can be used to infer sentiment towards any biodiversity topic from digital media data, and to detect which events are perceived most important to the public.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据