4.7 Article

Building a tool to overcome barriers in research-implementation spaces: The Conservation Evidence database

期刊

BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
卷 238, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2019.108199

关键词

Evidence-based conservation; Evidence-based policy; Evidence-based practice; Delphi technique; Subject-wide evidence synthesis; Research-implementation space

资金

  1. A.G. Leventis Foundation
  2. Arcadia
  3. British Ecological Society
  4. Defra
  5. Economic and Social Research Council
  6. Joint Nature Conservation Committee
  7. MAVA Foundation
  8. Natural England
  9. Natural Environment Research Council
  10. Nature Conservancy
  11. South West Water
  12. Synchronicity Earth
  13. Waitrose
  14. NERC [NE/N014472/1, NE/N014472/2, NE/K015419/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conservation practitioners, policy-makers and researchers work within shared spaces with many shared goals. Improving the flow of information between conservation researchers, practitioners and policy-makers could lead to dramatic gains in the effectiveness of conservation practice. However, several barriers can hinder this transfer including lack of time, inaccessibility of evidence, the real or perceived irrelevance of scientific research to practical questions, and the politically motivated spread of disinformation. Conservation Evidence works to overcome these barriers by providing a freely-available database of summarized scientific evidence for the effects of conservation interventions on biodiversity. The methods used to build this database - a combination of discipline-wide literature searching and subject-wide evidence synthesis - have been developed over the last 15 years to address the challenges of synthesizing large volumes of evidence of varying quality and measured outcomes. Here, we describe the methods to enhance understanding of the database and how it should be used. We discuss how the database can help to expand multi-directional information transfers between research, practice and policy, which should improve the implementation of evidence-based conservation and, ultimately, achieve better outcomes for biodiversity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据