4.6 Article

Fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2) but not FADS1 desaturates branched chain and odd chain saturated fatty acids

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbalip.2019.158572

关键词

Fatty acid desaturase 2; Delta 6-Desaturation; Branched chain fatty acids; Normal odd chain fatty acids; Monounsaturated fatty acids; Skin lipids

资金

  1. NIH from the National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health [R01 AT007003]
  2. Office of Dietary Supplements

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Branched chain fatty acids (BCFA) and linear chain/normal odd chain fatty acids (n-OCFA) are major fatty acids in human skin lipids, especially sebaceous gland (SG) wax esters. Skin lipids contain variable amounts of monounsaturated BCFA and n-OCFA, in some reports exceeding over 20% of total fatty acids. Fatty acid desaturase 2 (FADS2) codes for a multifunctional enzyme that catalyzes Delta 4-, Delta 6- and Delta 8-desaturation towards ten unsaturated fatty acids but only one saturate, palmitic acid, converting it to 16:1n-10; FADS2 is not active towards 14:0 or 18:0. Here we test the hypothesis that FADS2 also operates on BCFA and n-OCFA. MCF-7 cancer cells stably expressing FADS1 or FADS2 along with empty vector control cells were incubated with anteiso-15:0, iso-16:0, iso-17:0, anteiso-17:0, iso-18:0, or n-17:0. BCFA were Delta 6-desaturated by FADS2 as follows: iso-16:0 -> iso-6Z-16:1, iso-17:0 -> iso-6Z-17:1, anteiso-17:0 -> anteiso-6Z-17:1 and iso-18:0 -> iso-6Z-18:1. anteiso-15:0 was not desaturated in either FADS1 or FADS2 cells. n-17:0 was converted to both n-6Z-17:1 by FADS2 Delta 6-desaturation and n-9Z-17:1 by SCD Delta 9-desaturation. We thus establish novel FADS2-coded enzymatic activity towards BCFA and n-OCFA, expanding the number of known FADS2 saturated fatty acid substrates from one to six. Because of the importance of FADS2 in human skin, our results imply that dysfunction in activity of sebaceous FADS2 may play a role in skin abnormalities associated with skin lipids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据