4.6 Article

Adaptation of Cupriavidus necator to levulinic acid for enhanced production of P(3HB-co-3HV) copolyesters

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bej.2019.107350

关键词

polyhydroxyalkanoates; levulinic acid; adaptation; Cupriavidus necator; metabolic characterization

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation (GACR) [GA 19-20697S]
  2. Brno City Municipality
  3. project SoMoPro [6SA18032]
  4. European Union
  5. South Moravian Region [665,860]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Evolutionary engineering is an approach, which allows preparing microorganisms with desired phenotype without the need for knowledge of genetic characteristics connected with changes at phenotype level. This approach is based on cell multiplication under stress conditions and it can be performed in various designs. In connection with PHA-producing bacteria, evolutionary engineering can be used to gain microorganisms producing PHAs with required material properties. Using levulinic acid (LA) as a stress factor and Cupriavidus necator H16 as a model PHA producing bacterial strain, five evolved strains have been obtained in the present study. Compared with the parental strain, all of these showed better growth in the presence of LA, strains ALA01 and ALA04 showed higher PHA content in biomass and strains ALA03 and ALA04 showed higher 3-hydroxyvalerate (3HV) content in copolymer P(3HB-co-3HV). By DSC and FTIR analysis of polymers, connections between 3HV content, crystallinity and melting temperature have been studied. Metabolic characterization provided information about possible adaptation strategies of evolved strains, while based on methods of statistical analysis similarities and differences between individual strains were discussed. Considering obtained information, evolutionary engineering displays a useful tool for modification of microorganisms together with fine-tuning the properties of produced metabolites (PHA copolyesters).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据