4.6 Article

Hydrogen treatment prevents lipopolysaccharide-induced pulmonary endothelial cell dysfunction through RhoA inhibition

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.11.101

关键词

Sepsis; Pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (PMVECs); Hydrogen-rich medium; Tight junction; Adherens junction; RhoA

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81801889]
  2. Tianjin Bureau of Foreign Experts Affairs [JH-20180070802-2018038]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (PMVECs) are initial targets of sepsis-induced acute lung injury (ALI). During the apoptosis of PMVECs, tight junctions (TJ) and adherens junctions (AJ) are firstly damaged. Previous studies have suggested hydrogen treatment can protect lung microvasculature of mice from sepsis-induced endothelial dysfunction and maintain the coherence of pulmonary endothelium, but the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Methods: We investigated the role of hydrogen-rich medium on regulating intercellular junction proteins under lipopolysaccharide (LPS) treatment which mimicked sepsis in vitro. Changes of cytoskeleton regulatory protein ROCK and RhoA as well as PMVEC apoptotic rate were examined. Results: LPS treatment reduced the expression levels of occludin and VE-cadherin in PMVECs, while hydrogen-rich medium can recover these changes. Furthermore, H-2 can significantly ameliorate the excessive expression of ROCK and RhoA under sepsis-mimicking condition. The application of RhoA activator U-46619 resulted in a more significant elevation in cell apoptotic rate as well as reduction in the expression of junctional proteins. Using H-2 can almost completely inhibit the effects of RhoA activator. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that RhoA is a crucial protein in the signaling pathway of LPS-induced endothelial cell dysfunction. Hydrogen treatment can prevent LPS-induced junctional injury and cell death by inhibiting the activity of RhoA. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据