4.6 Article

Imipramine administered before the first of two forced swim sessions results in reduced immobility in the second session 24 h later

期刊

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 373, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112088

关键词

Antidepressants; Dopamine receptor; Activation; Response effort allocation; Response efficacy

资金

  1. Fondazione di Sardegna, Sassari, Italy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A previous study investigating the effects of dopamine receptor antagonists administered before the first of two 24-h apart forced swim test (FST) sessions, provided evidence suggesting that evaluation of response efficacy dependent on dopamine D-2-like receptors - might play a role in setting the balance between active behaviours and immobility in this test. Regardless of the underlying mechanisms, the observation that the effects of drugs in the first session have consequences in the second session might be relevant for a better understanding of the FST in behavioural/functional terms. Thus, the first objective of this study was to investigate the consequences in the second session of the administration of the prototypic antidepressant drug imipramine before the first of two sessions. A second objective was to investigate the effect of dopamine D-1-like and D2-like receptor blockade on the effects of imipramine. Imipramine (20 mg/kg) was administered 24-h, 6-h and 30-min before the first of two FST sessions performed 24-h apart. SCH 23390 (0.01, 0.04 mg/kg) or raclopride (0.0125, 0.25 mg/kg) were administered 30-min before the first session. Imipramine increased active behaviours both in the first and in the second session. Raclopride attenuated and SCH 23390 potentiated imipramine effects only in the first session and to a limited extent. These results show that imipramine administration before the first of two FST sessions induces an increase in active behaviours in the second session, and suggest that this effect is the consequence of the behavioural effects of imipramine in the first session.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据