4.3 Article

Nurse-Delivered Brief Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia in Lung Cancer Survivors: A Pilot RCT

期刊

BEHAVIORAL SLEEP MEDICINE
卷 18, 期 6, 页码 774-786

出版社

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/15402002.2019.1685523

关键词

-

资金

  1. VA Western New York Healthcare System, Buffalo, NY
  2. National Institute of Nursing Research [1R15NR013779]
  3. [R15NR013779]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective/Background: Insomnia occurs in 50 to 80% of lung cancer survivors. Cognitive behavioral therapy is the standard treatment for insomnia (CBTI); however, treatment length and lack of psychologists trained in CBTI limits access. Brief Behavioral Treatment for Insomnia (BBTI), a nurse-delivered modified CBTI, is proposed. This feasibility pilot study sought to compare the BBTI intervention to attention control Healthy Eating Program (HEP) for insomnia in lung cancer survivors. Participants: The participants comprised adults, 21 years of age or older with insomnia and stage I/II non-small cell lung cancer, more than 6 weeks from surgery and living in Western NY. Methods: Participants (n = 40) were randomly assigned to an experimental (BBTI) or attention control condition (Healthy Eating Program). Thirty participants completed the study. Results: Participants were 66 years of age (+/- 7.6; range 53-82), 40% (n = 16) male, 87.5% (n = 35) Caucasian, 50% (n = 20) married, BMI 27.7 (+/- 5.8), and 12% (n = 5) never smokers. Baseline sleep diary sleep efficiency, ISI and other baseline covariates were balanced between the groups. Sleep efficiency improved >= 85% in BBTI group (p = .02), but not in HEP control group (p = 1.00). Mean ISI for BBTI and attention control were 6.40 +/- 4.98 and 14.10 +/- 4.48 (p = .001) respectively. In addition, BBTI group mean total FACT-L score improved by 6.66 points from baseline while HEP group score worsened (p = .049). Conclusions: BBTI is a practical, evidence-based, clinically relevant intervention that improved sleep and quality of life in lung cancer survivors with insomnia. Additional research to evaluate efficacy, duration, and implementation strategies are essential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据