4.0 Article

The impact of maternal body mass index on the rate of obstetric anal sphincter injury in nulliparous women: A Victorian retrospective cohort study

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13091

关键词

body mass index; logistic regression; obesity; obstetric anal sphincter injury; perineum

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background Maternal obesity is an important comorbidity in contemporary obstetrics practice and is associated with significantly increased perinatal complications. Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) sustained during labour can lead to faecal incontinence, chronic pain and effects on quality of life. Currently, it is unclear if maternal body mass index (BMI) influences the risk of sustaining OASIS. Aim To investigate the impact of increased BMI on the rate of OASIS among nulliparous women. Materials and Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted, which included nulliparous women with singleton, vaginal deliveries >= 37 weeks gestation at a Victorian regional centre between 2007 and 2017 (n = 3335). Logistic regression was performed to calculate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios (aOR). Women were grouped by World Health Organization BMI categories, and the rates of OASIS were evaluated. Results Women with a BMI >= 25 were significantly less likely to develop OASIS compared to women with a BMI < 25 (aOR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.89). Women with a BMI >= 35 had significantly decreased odds of OASIS compared to normal weight women (aOR 0.27, 0.10-0.78). While not statistically significant, the odds of OASIS decreased with each increase in BMI class. Other statistically significant risk factors were maternal age, birth weight, forceps delivery, non-smokers (aOR 4.03, 1.46-11.1) and diabetes mellitus (aOR 9.48, 2.1-41.4). Conclusion Women with a BMI >= 25 were less likely to sustain OASIS compared to women with a BMI < 25. Furthermore, the odds of OASIS decreased for each increase in BMI category. These findings warrant further investigation into the mechanism of this protective effect.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据