Validity of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Measurement of Hip Labral Width Compared With Intraoperative Assessment

Purpose: To determine if magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could accurately determine the width of the labrum. Methods: Consecutively enrolled patients between the ages of 18 and 65 indicated for hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement were included between December 2017 and June 2018. Inclusion criteria for preoperative MRIs included: MRI availability in picture archiving and communication system; performance on a 1.5T or 3T MRI or 3T MRA; and adequate quality and lack of labrum ossification. Intraoperative labral width measurements were taken at standardized locations using an established acetabular clockface paradigm. Measurement was performed using a calibrated probe. The labral width was defined as the distance from the labrum extended laterally from the acetabular rim. MRI measurements were taken by 2 blinded musculoskeletal fellowship-trained radiologists at the same positions. Measurements were made at the 11:30 o'clock position (indirect rectus) on coronal proton density (PD) sequence, at 3 o'clock position (psoas-U) on axial oblique PD sequence, and at 1:30 (a point halfway between the 2) on sagittal fat-suppressed PD. The surgeons were blinded to the radiologists' measurements and vice versa. Intraoperative and radiographic labral width measurements were compared using an intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), absolute agreement, and 2-way random effects model. The 2 radiologists' measurements were compared for interrater reliability using the same ICC model. Results: Fifty-one patients were included (30 females, 26 right hips). Average labrum width at the 3:00, 11:30, and 1:30 o'clock positions by arthroscopic measurement were 5.8 mm (range; standard deviation, 2-8; +/- 1.4), 6.3 mm (2-10; +/- 1.5) and 6.0 mm (2-9; +/- 1.5), and by MRI were 6.3 mm (2-10; +/- 1.5), 6.7 mm (3-10; +/- 1.4), and 6.1 mm (2-9; +/- 1.6), respectively. When including all MRI modalities, ICC agreement between intraoperative assessment, and radiologist assessment at the 3:00 o'clock, 11:30, and point halfway between was 0.82 (P < .001), 0.78 (P < .001), 0.84 (P < .001), respectively. Radiologist interrater ICC agreement at the same points was 0.88 (P < .001), 0.93 (P < .001), and 0.88 (P < .001). Conclusions: Strong agreement was found between radiologic and arthroscopic measurement of labrum width when using MRI, suggesting MRI is an accurate way to measure labral width. There was not a significant difference between different MRI modalities. Accurately measuring labral width preoperatively with MRI may aid in surgical decision making.