4.7 Article

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated myostatin disruption enhances muscle mass in the olive flounder Paralichthys olivaceus

期刊

AQUACULTURE
卷 512, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.734336

关键词

Paralichthys olivaceus; Microinjection; Genome editing; CRISPR/Cas9; Myostatin; Muscle mass

资金

  1. National Institute of Fisheries Science (NIFS) of the Republic of Korea [R2019018]
  2. Institute of Planning & Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry & Fisheries (iPET), Republic of Korea [R2019018] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Myostatin (MSTN), a negative regulator of skeletal muscle development, is the major gene of interest for improving animal breeding productivity, including for aquaculture. We introduced a CRISPR/Cas9 system to disrupt Paralichthys olivaceus MSTN (PoMSTN) using microinjection. Cas9 mRNA and sgRNAs targeting the first exon of the PoMSTN gene were co-injected into embryos of P. olivaceus. On-target mutations on the PoMSTN locus were generated in somatic tissues with 75.6% efficiency, and founders harboring germline mutations were produced in the F0 generation. In the F1 generation, restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis was applied to select biallelic mutants, and heterozygous biallelic mutants with PoMSTN disruption were obtained. PoMSTN-disrupted P. olivaceus exhibited greater body thickness and increased condition factor, indicating the enhancement of muscle mass with muscle hyperplasia. Expression of PoMSTN mRNA and protein was significantly reduced in the muscle of PoMSTN-disrupted P. olivaceus, and the mRNA expression of major myogenic regulatory factors (myogenin, MyoD, and Myf5) was differentially affected in PoMSTN-disrupted mutants. These results suggest that the establishment of a CRISPR/Cas9 system in P. olivaceus provides powerful tools for related genetic studies and breeding.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据