4.7 Article

Sharply increasing the visible photoreactivity of g-C3N4 by breaking the intralayered hydrogen bonds

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 505, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144654

关键词

g-C3N4; Photocatalytic H-2 evolution; Visible light; S-doping; Hydrogen bonds

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672312, 21373275]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, South-Central University for Nationalities [CZP19006]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Photocatalytic H-2 production has attracted much attention using visible-light-responsive graphitic carbon nitride (g-C3N4) as photocatalyst. However, two-dimensional g-C3N4 has suffered from poor photocatalytic activity due to numerous intralayered hydrogen bonds and limited visible-light-responsive range. To solve this problem, in this paper, breaking the hydrogen bonds of g-C3N4 by S-doping is reported through poly-condensation of dicyandiamide (DCDA)-thioacetamide (TAA) mixture. The effects of TAA amount on the structure, property and photocatalytic performance of S-doped g-C3N4 are systematically studied. Among all the prepared photo catalysts, sample T0.6, exhibits the highest photoreactivity with a hydrogen production rate of 525.5 mu mol g(-1) h(-1) under the visible light irradiation (lambda > 420 nm), which is 7.7-times higher than that of bulk g-C3N4 (BCN). The enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production is mainly attributed to substituting of sp(2)-hybridized N with S atoms, which breaks intralayered hydrogen bonds of g-C3N4, resulting in greatly enhanced visible-light-response ability and efficient migration and separation of photo-induced charge carriers by facilitating the n -> pi* electron transition. In addition, the porous structures of S-doped multi-layered g-C3N4 also provide more reactive sites for water-splitting, which also facilitates the hydrogen production. The present study provides new insights into the design of high efficient g-C3N4-based photocatalyst.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据