4.4 Review

The hypoxic microenvironment: A determinant of cancer stem cell evolution

期刊

BIOESSAYS
卷 38, 期 -, 页码 S65-S74

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201670911

关键词

cancer stem cell; hypoxia; microenvironment; tumor evolution

资金

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity - FEDER from Regional Development European Funds (European Union) [Fis: PI12/00137, PI15/00045, RTICC: RD12/0036/0028]
  2. Consejeria de Ciencia e Innovacion [CTS-1848]
  3. Consejeria de Salud of the Junta de Andalucia [PI-0135-2010, PI-0306-2012, PI-0096-2014]
  4. ISCIII [PIE13/0004]
  5. FEDER
  6. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity [FIS PI12/01104, PI15/01262]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tumors are often viewed as unique entities with specific behaviors. However, tumors are a mixture of differentially evolved subpopulations of cells in constant Darwinian evolution, selecting the fittest clone and allowing it to outgrow the rest. As in the natural environment, the niche defines the properties the fittest clones must possess. Therefore, there can be multiple fit clones because of the various microenvironments inside a single tumor. Hypoxia is considered to be a major feature of the tumor microenvironment and is a potential contributor to the cancer stem cell (CSC) phenotype and its enhanced tumorigenicity. The acidic microenvironment around hypoxic cells is accompanied by the activation of a subset of proteases that contribute to metastasis. Because of aberrant angiogenesis and the inaccessibility of their locations, hypoxic cells are less likely to accumulate therapeutic concentrations of chemotherapeutics that can lead to therapeutic resistance. Therefore, the targeting of the hypoxic CSC niche in combination with chemotherapy may provide a promising strategy for eradicating CSCs. In this review, we examine the cancer stem cell hypothesis and its relationship to the microenvironment, specifically to hypoxia and the subsequent metabolic switch and how they shape tumor behavior.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据