4.7 Article

Magnetic metal-organic frameworks/carbon dots as a multifunctional platform for detection and removal of uranium

期刊

APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE
卷 491, 期 -, 页码 640-649

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.108

关键词

Multifunctional; Carbon dots; Metal-organic frameworks; Uranium; Adsorption; Detection

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [NSFC 51872057]
  2. Application Technology Research and Development Plan of Heilongjiang Province [GX16A009]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds of the Central University (HEUCFZ)
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province [QC2018010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herein, a design of multifunctional hybrid adsorbent made of a magnetic core and a zeolite imidazolate framework (ZIF-8) shell embedded with carbon dots (CDs) is synthesized to combine detection with separation and recycling of uranium from aqueous solution. The adsorbents retain the strong superparamagnetic behavior of Fe3O4 nanoparticles and similar luminescence of carbon dots. Interestingly, the adsorbents not only exhibit obviously fluorescence response for U(VI) but also enhance U(VI) adsorption performance via assisting with the loaded-carbon dots. The adsorption processes of U(VI) on Fe3O4-CMC@ZIF-8 and Fe3O4-CMC@ZIF-8@CDs well fit with the pseudo-second-order model. The maximum U(VI) adsorption amount of Fe3O4-CMC@ZIF-8@CDs is high as 606.06 mg/g at pH = 4.0 and T = 298 K with Langmuir model, which is obviously higher than that of Fe3O4-CMC@ZIF-8 (564.97 mg/g). Particularly, BET, FTIR and XPS results show that the improvement of adsorption properties on Fe3O4-CMC@ZIF-8@CDs is mainly ascribed to the large specific surface area and abundant nitrogen/oxygen functional groups on the surface, suggesting that the main interaction mechanisms are diffusion and coordination. The design for hybrid materials provides a convenient way to achieve a multifunctional adsorbent with detection, separation and recycling properties for uranium.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据