4.7 Review

How liquid biopsies can change clinical practice in oncology

期刊

ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
卷 30, 期 10, 页码 1580-1590

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz227

关键词

liquid biopsy; circulating free DNA; cancer diagnosis; resistance; minimal residual disease; clonal evolution

类别

资金

  1. European Community [602901 MErCuRIC]
  2. H2020 grant [635342-2 MoTriColor]
  3. IMI contract [115749 CANCER-ID]
  4. AIRC [16788, 21923]
  5. FONDAZIONE AIRC under 5 per Mille 2018 [21091]
  6. AIRC-CRUK-FC AECC Accelerator Award [22795]
  7. Ministero della Salute [NET-2011-02352137]
  8. Fondazione Piemontese per la Ricerca sul Cancro-ONLUS 5 per mille 2014 e 2015 Ministero della Salute
  9. Roche per la Ricerca grant 2017
  10. AIRC
  11. Asociacion Espanola contra el Cancer [GCTRA16015SEDA]
  12. FIS-ISCIII grant [PI16/01278]
  13. FERO-EDM support
  14. Cellex foundations
  15. Commonwealth Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cell-free DNA fragments are shed into the bloodstream by tumor cells. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), commonly known as liquid biopsy, can be exploited for a variety of clinical applications. ctDNA is being used to genotype solid cancers non-invasively, to track tumor dynamics and to detect the emergence of drug resistance. In a few settings, liquid biopsies have already entered clinical practice. For example, ctDNA is used to guide treatment in a subset of lung cancers. In this review, we discuss how recent improvements in the sensitivity and accuracy of ctDNA analyses have led to unprecedented advances in this research field. We further consider what is required for the routine deployment of liquid biopsies in the clinical diagnostic space. We pinpoint technical hurdles that liquid biopsies have yet to overcome, including preanalytical and analytical challenges. We foresee how liquid biopsies will transform clinical practice: by complementing (or replacing) imaging to monitor treatment response and by detecting minimal residual disease after surgery with curative intent.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据