4.8 Review

Revisiting the Electroplating Process for Lithium-Metal Anodes for Lithium-Metal Batteries

期刊

ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION
卷 59, 期 17, 页码 6665-6674

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201912217

关键词

additive; electroplating; kinetics; lithium-metal batteries; thermodynamics

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51872196, U1601206]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China [17JCJQJC44100]
  3. Metal Fuel Cell Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province
  4. National Postdoctoral Program for Innovative Talent [BX20190232]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electroplating has been studied for centuries, not only in the laboratory but also in industry for machinery, electronics, automobile, aviation, and other fields. The lithium-metal anode is the Holy Grail electrode because of its high energy density. But the recyclability of lithium-metal batteries remains quite challenging. The essence of both conventional electroplating and lithium plating is the same, reduction of metal cations. Thus, industrial electroplating knowledge can be applied to revisit the electroplating process for lithium-metal anodes. In conventional electroplating, some strategies like using additives, modifying substrates, applying pulse current, and agitating electrolyte have been explored to suppress dendrite growth. These methods are also effective in lithium-metal anodes. Inspired by that, we revisit the fundamental electroplating theory for lithium-metal anodes in this Minireview, mainly drawing attention to the theory of electroplating thermodynamics and kinetics. Analysis of essential differences between traditional electroplating and plating/stripping of lithium-metal anodes is also presented. Thus, industrial electroplating knowledge can be applied to the electroplating process of lithium-metal anodes to improve commercial lithium-metal batteries and the study of lithium plating/stripping can further enrich the classical electroplating technique.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据