4.8 Article

Selective Determination of Isothermally Amplified Zika Virus RNA Using a Universal DNA-Hairpin Probe in Less than 1 Hour

期刊

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 91, 期 21, 页码 13458-13464

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.9b02455

关键词

-

资金

  1. NSF-CBET [1706802]
  2. Florida Health Department [7ZKO5, 7ZK33]
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1706802] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The recent outbreak of the Zika virus (ZIKV) in the Americas and multiple studies that linked the virus to the cases of microcephaly and neurological complications have revealed the need for cost efficient and rapid ZIKV diagnostics tests. Here, a diagnostic platform relying on a four-way junction (4WJ)-based biosensor with electrochemical readout using a Universal DNA-Hairpin (UDH) probe for the selective recognition of an isothermally amplified ZIKV RNA fragment is developed. The 4WJ structure utilizes an electrode-immobilized stem-loop (DNA-hairpin) probe and two DNA adaptor strands complementary to both the stem-loop probe and the targeted fragment of a ZIKV amplicon. One of the adaptor strands is responsible for high selectivity of the target recognition, while another helps unwinding the target secondary structure. The first adaptor strand contains a redox label methylene blue to trigger the current change in response to the target-dependent formation of the 4WJ structure on the surface of the electrode. The amplicon can be analyzed directly from the amplification sample without the need for its purification. The proposed diagnostic methodology exhibits the limit of ZIKV RNA detection of 1.11 fg/mu L (similar to 0.3 fM) and high selectivity that allows for reliable discrimination of ZIKV from West Nile virus and four dengue virus serotypes. Overall, the analysis of ZIKV RNA can be completed in less than 1 h, including amplification and electrochemical detection.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据