4.7 Article

Raman spectroscopy reveals distinct differences between two closely related bacterial strains, Mycobacterium indicus pranii and Mycobacterium intracellulare

期刊

ANALYTICAL AND BIOANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 411, 期 30, 页码 7997-8009

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00216-019-02197-z

关键词

Mycobacterium indicus pranii; Mycobacterium intracellulare; Atomic force microscopy; Raman spectroscopy; Resonance Raman spectroscopy; Carotenoids; Mycolic acid

资金

  1. DST
  2. DBT [BT/PR13522/COE/34/27/2015]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A common technique used to differentiate bacterial species and to determine evolutionary relationships is sequencing their 16S ribosomal RNA genes. However, this method fails when organisms exhibit high similarity in these sequences. Two such strains that have identical 16S rRNA sequences are Mycobacterium indicus pranii (MIP) and Mycobacterium intracellulare. MIP is of significance as it is used as an adjuvant for protection against tuberculosis and leprosy; in addition, it shows potent anti-cancer activity. On the other hand, M. intracellulare is an opportunistic pathogen and causes severe respiratory infections in AIDS patients. It is important to differentiate these two bacterial species as they co-exist in immuno-compromised individuals. To unambiguously distinguish these two closely related bacterial strains, we employed Raman and resonance Raman spectroscopy in conjunction with multivariate statistical tools. Phenotypic profiling for these bacterial species was performed in a kinetic manner. Differences were observed in the mycolic acid profile and carotenoid pigments to show that MIP is biochemically distinct from M. intracellulare. Resonance Raman studies confirmed that carotenoids were produced by both MIP as well as M. intracellulare, though the latter produced higher amounts. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of Raman spectroscopy in differentiating two closely related mycobacterial strains.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据