4.3 Article

Post-translational modifications of plant cell wall proteins and peptides: A survey from a proteomics point of view

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.02.022

关键词

Cell wall; N-glycosylation; O-glycosylation; GPI anchor; Plant; Protein processing; Proteomics; Peptidomics

资金

  1. Universite Paul Sabatier (Toulouse, France)
  2. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
  3. French Laboratory of Excellence project entitled TULIP [ANR-10-LABX-41, ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Plant cell wall proteins (CWPs) and peptides are important players in cell walls contributing to their assembly and their remodeling during development and in response to environmental constraints. Since the rise of proteomics technologies at the beginning of the 2000's, the knowledge of CWPs has greatly increased leading to the discovery of new CWP families and to the description of the cell wall proteomes of different organs of many plants. Conversely, cell wall peptidomics data are still lacking. In addition to the identification of CWPs and peptides by mass spectrometry (MS) and bioinformatics, proteomics has allowed to describe their post-translational modifications (PTMs). At present, the best known PTMs consist in proteolytic cleavage, N-glycosylation, hydroxylation of P residues into hydroxyproline residues (O), O-glycosylation and glypiation. In this review, the methods allowing the capture of the modified proteins based on the specific properties of their PTMs as well as the MS technologies used for their characterization are briefly described. A focus is done on proteolytic cleavage leading to protein maturation or release of signaling peptides and on O-glycosylation. Some new technologies, like top-down proteomics and terminomics, are described. They aim at a finer description of proteoforms resulting from PTMs or degradation mechanisms. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Plant Proteomics-a bridge between fundamental processes and crop production, edited by Dr. Hans-Peter Mock. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据