4.5 Review

CRAC channels, calcium, and cancer in light of the driver and passenger concept

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.12.009

关键词

CRAC channels; Calcium; STIM; STIM1; STIM2; Orai; Orai1; Orai2; Orai3; TRPV5; TRPV6; Cancer; Tumor; Cancer driver gene; Cancer passenger gene; CTLA4; Checkpoint therapy; Cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL); Natural killer (NK) cells; Tumor microenvironment

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SFB 1027, SFB 894]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advances in next-generation sequencing allow very comprehensive analyses of large numbers of cancer genomes leading to an increasingly better characterization and classification of cancers. Comparing genomic data predicts candidate genes driving development, growth, or metastasis of cancer. Cancer driver genes are defined as genes whose mutations are causally implicated in oncogenesis whereas passenger mutations are defined as not being oncogenic. Currently, a list of several hundred cancer driver mutations is discussed including prominent members like TP53, BRAF, NRAS, or NF1. According to the vast literature on Ca2+ and cancer, Ca2+ signals and the underlying Ca2+ channels and transporters certainly influence the development, growth, and metastasis of many cancers. In this review, I focus on the calcium release-activated calcium (CRAC) channel genes STIM and Orai and their role for cancer development, growth, and metastasis. STIM and Orai genes are being discussed in the context of current cancer concepts with a focus on the driver-passenger hypothesis. One result of this discussion is the hypothesis that a driver analysis of Ca2+ homeostasis-related genes should not be carried out by looking at isolated genes. Rather a pool of Ca2+ genes might be considered to act as one potential cancer driver. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Calcium and Cell Fate. Guest Editors: Jacques Haiech, Claus Heizmann, Joachim Krebs, Thierry Capiod and Olivier Mignen. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据