4.6 Article

Long noncoding RNA ARHGAP27P1 inhibits gastric cancer cell proliferation and cell cycle progression through epigenetically regulating p15 and p16

期刊

AGING-US
卷 11, 期 20, 页码 9090-9110

出版社

IMPACT JOURNALS LLC
DOI: 10.18632/aging.102377

关键词

ARHGAP27P1; JMJD3; p15; p16; gastric cancer (GC)

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China [81500193, 81802409]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20161353]
  3. Key Youth Talents Program in Health, Jiangsu Province [QNRC2016454]
  4. Social Development Foundation of Zhenjiang [SH2018072, SH2018057]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as important regulators in the development and progression of gastric cancer (GC). ARHGAP27P1 is a pseudogene-derived lncRNA, and it has been found to be associated with GC in our preliminary study, but this association has not been studied further. Herein, we confirmed that ARHGAP27P1 was significantly downregulated in GC tissues, plasma and cells. Low expression of ARHGAP27P1 was closely associated with advanced TNM stage, increased invasion depth and lymphatic metastasis. Low ARHGAP27P1 expression also predicted a poor prognosis in GC patients. Functionally, overexpression of ARHGAP27P1 inhibited proliferation, invasion, and migration in GC cells, while silencing of ARHGAP27P1 showed the opposite effects. Mechanistic investigations showed that ARHGAP27P1 had a key role in G0/G1 arrest. We further demonstrated that ARHGAP27P1 was associated with Jumonji-domain containing 3 (JMJD3) and that this association was required for the demethylation of H3K27me3, thereby epigenetically activating expression of p15, p16 and p57. Moreover, knockdown of JMJD3, p15, or p16 consistently reversed the inhibitory effects of ARHGAP27P1 in cell proliferation and cell cycle progression. Taken together, these results suggest that lncRNA ARHGAP27P1, as a novel cell cycle regulator, may serve as a potential target for GC prevention and treatment in human GC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据