4.7 Article

Enhanced photocatalytic performance of Cu2O nano-photocatalyst powder modified by ball milling and ZnO

期刊

ADVANCED POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 31, 期 1, 页码 40-50

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apt.2019.09.035

关键词

Cu2O; ZnO; Ball milling; Photocatalyst; Kinetics

资金

  1. University of Tehran

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a ball milled Cu2O-ZnO nano-photocatalyst with good photocatalytic performance in visible light range was prepared. Effect of ZnO presence and ball milling of Cu2O on the structure, microstructure, optical properties and photocatalytic performance were studied. X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), transmission electron microscope (TEM), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), photoluminescence (PL) analysis and UV-Vis spectrophotometer were used as characterization techniques. FESEM results indicated that ball milling of Cu2O changed the morphology of Cu2O-ZnO composite. The uniform formation of ZnO particles with average size of 30 nm over the Cu2O surface was observed. The formation of p-n heterostructure with good contact between Cu2O and ZnO nanoparticles was found by HRTEM image. Ball milling of Cu2O promotes visible light absorption and reduction band gap to 1.9 eV in Cu2O-ZnO photocatalyst. Intensity of PL spectra for the ball milled Cu2O-ZnO photocatalyst was obviously lower. Ball milled Cu2O-ZnO photocatalyst shows the highest photocatalytic activity and degradation efficiency of 98% was obtained for 2 mg/L methylene blue (MB) solution after 240 min. The kinetics of the photodegradation was followed the Langmuir-Hinshelwood (L-H) model and degradation rates were decreased by increase of MB concentration. In the case of ball milled Cu2O and presence of ZnO, the MB degradation kinetics was two times faster. (C) 2019 The Society of Powder Technology Japan. Published by Elsevier B.V. and The Society of Powder Technology Japan. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据