4.8 Article

Boosting Oxygen Evolution Reaction by Creating Both Metal Ion and Lattice-Oxygen Active Sites in a Complex Oxide

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201905025

关键词

complex oxides; coordination environment; dual active sites; honeycomb-like structures; oxygen evolution reaction

资金

  1. Defense industrial technology development program [JCKY2018605B006]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [21576135]
  3. Jiangsu Nature Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars [BK20170043]
  4. Australian Research Council [DE190100005]
  5. Australian Research Council [DE190100005] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Developing efficient and low-cost electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is of paramount importance to many chemical and energy transformation technologies. The diversity and flexibility of metal oxides offer numerous degrees of freedom for enhancing catalytic activity by tailoring their physicochemical properties, but the active site of current metal oxides for OER is still limited to either metal ions or lattice oxygen. Here, a new complex oxide with unique hexagonal structure consisting of one honeycomb-like network, Ba4Sr4(Co0.8Fe0.2)(4)O-15 (hex-BSCF), is reported, demonstrating ultrahigh OER activity because both the tetrahedral Co ions and the octahedral oxygen ions on the surface are active, as confirmed by combined X-ray absorption spectroscopy analysis and theoretical calculations. The bulk hex-BSCF material synthesized by the facile and scalable sol-gel method achieves 10 mA cm(-2) at a low overpotential of only 340 mV (and small Tafel slope of 47 mV dec(-1)) in 0.1 m KOH, surpassing most metal oxides ever reported for OER, while maintaining excellent durability. This study opens up a new avenue to dramatically enhancing catalytic activity of metal oxides for other applications through rational design of structures with multiple active sites.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据