4.8 Article

One-Step Rapid Fabrication of Cell-Only Living Fibers

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 32, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201906305

关键词

biomaterial-free constructs; cell therapies; fiber-shaped tissue; scaffold-free cellular aggregates; tissue engineering

资金

  1. Programa Operacional Competitividade e Internacionalizacao, in the component FEDER
  2. national funds (OE) through FCT/MCTES [PTDC/BTM-ORG/30770/2017]
  3. FCT/MEC [POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007679, UID/CTM/50011/2013]
  4. FEDER under the PT2020 Partnership Agreement
  5. [CEECIND/03605/2017]
  6. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BTM-ORG/30770/2017] Funding Source: FCT

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cellular aggregates are used as relevant regenerative building blocks, tissue models, and cell delivery platforms. Biomaterial-free structures are often assembled either as 2D cell sheets or spherical microaggregates, both incompatible with free-form deposition, and dependent on challenging processes for macroscale 3D upscaling. The continuous and elongated nature of fiber-shaped materials enables their deposition in unrestricted multiple directions. Cellular fiber fabrication has often required exogenously provided support proteins and/or the use of biomaterial-based sacrificial templates. Here, the rapid (<24 h) assembly of fiberoids is reported: living centimeter-long scaffold-free fibers of cells produced in the absence of exogenous materials or supplements. Adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cell fiberoids can be easily modulated into complex multidimensional geometries and show tissue-invasive properties while keeping the secretion of trophic factors. Proangiogenic properties studied on a chick chorioallantoic membrane in an ovo model are observed for heterotypic fiberoids containing endothelial cells. These micro-to-macrotissues may find application as morphogenic therapeutic and tissue-mimetic building blocks, with the ability to integrate 3D and 4D full biological materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据